Introduction

Assembly of the engine isn't simply a matter of torque and timing—it's rhythm. A symphony of well-coordinated stations, tools, and manpower working together in harmonious synchrony. But when the stage itself, the layout, is preventing the performance? That's the problem that top DG Set engine maker wanted to solve when it relocated operations to a new facility and redesigned its plant layout.

The challenge was not only to insert the current process into a new space, but to reimagine how the plant operated, simplifying movement, leveling the line, and maximizing every minute and every meter. With Production Modeling India (PMI) as the industrial engineering partner, the makeover was initiated.

Project Objectives

There were three distinct goals for the project:

This was not a mere relocation, it was a chance to future-proof the plant, boost productivity, and improve aesthetics and safety simultaneously.

Challenging Issues, Layered Solutions

The project involved several issues, primarily:
• Coordinating a multi-model assembly line without interrupting flow
• Developing layout alternatives that maximized material flow, storage, and safety
• Factoring in space constraints while improving overall efficiency
• Harmonizing direct and indirect manpower deployment in line with takt time targets
In short, PMI had to take a fresh look at every square meter of the facility—not just for how it was used, but how it should be used.

93% Productivity Boost & 48% Manpower Optimization: PMI Redesigns DG Set Engine Assembly with Smart Layout & IE Study

PMI’s Three-Phase Approach

PMI’s team started with a thorough walkthrough of the existing facility to understand the real-time process flow, bottlenecks, and operational pain points. Key activities included:

  • Studying current layouts and productivity reports

  • Identifying space usage inefficiencies

  • Conducting elemental work measurement for each assembly activity using PMTS

Three detailed layout options were created and compared on multiple parameters:

  • Material movement efficiency
  • Gangway safety
  • Paint shop isolation
  • Chain length and direction of flow
  • Space for genset, canopy, FG storage, and dispatch

  • Unidirectional flow for easy movement
  • Reduced chain length for effective painting cycles
  • Paint shop segregation to avoid fire risk
  • Material in-warding and dispatch zones dedicated, so no doc conflicts
  • Aesthetic uplift with product gallery at reception

Results That Speak Volumes

The effect of the redesign was not only aesthetic—it was quantifiable. The most important metrics compared between the current and proposed systems demonstrated:

  • Productivity was enhanced by 93%
  • Manpower decreased by 48%
  • Assembly line balancing became much more balanced, with idle stations eliminated and uneven workloads eradicated.

Existing vs Proposed Line Balancing

Existing:

  • Under-utilized Manpower

  • Production at 6.7 min Takt

  • Uneven Line Balancing

Proposed:

  • Increased Manpower Utilization

  • Production at 4.01 min Takt

  • Stations and Activities are merged for Line Balancing

Recommendations and the Road Ahead

PMI also offered important improvement recommendations to further enhance performance:

  • Powered conveyors for decreased dependency and efficiency of movement

  • Oven length enlargement to increase throughput

  • Coolant and water filling automation for eliminating additional cycle time

Conclusion

What began as a change in location became a total re-examination of the way that the plant operated. By using smart layout planning, accurate work measurement, and data-driven decision-making, PMI enabled the client to gain substantial improvements in efficiency, safety, and scalability. Ultimately, it wasn't merely an assembly line that was reoriented, it was the very pace of production.

    Download Our Company Brochure